Practical Application of the ZAS Theory of Civilized Justice
Scenario:
A group of horse riders armed with weapons are stranded in a desert without water. They encounter two individuals who possess enough water to save the riders’ lives. However, the two individuals refuse to share the water despite the dire situation.
Core Principle:
“The right of a person cannot be denied in any case.”
States Involved:
1. State of Ownership: The two individuals own the water, and their right to it is absolute.
2. State of Need: The riders face an urgent need for water, but their desperation does not override the rights of the owners.
Reasoning:
Under the ZAS Theory, justice prioritizes respect for individual rights over situational needs. Violating the rights of others—even in life-threatening situations—undermines the foundation of civilized justice.
Conclusion:
The riders must respect the ownership of the water and seek alternative solutions or accept their fate. Taking the water by force would be an injustice. This scenario illustrates how the ZAS Theory ensures fairness and moral consistency, even in challenging situations.